
The first review is in for Oliver Stone's take on the George W. Bush presidency. Far from a rave, far from a pan...
Via Variety:
Oliver Stone's unusual and inescapably interesting "W." feels like a rough draft of a film it might behoove him to remake in 10 or 15 years. The director's third feature to hinge on a modern-era presidency, after "JFK" and "Nixon," offers a clear and plausible take on the current chief executive's psychological makeup and, considering Stone's reputation and Bush's vast unpopularity, a relatively even-handed, restrained treatment of recent politics. For a film that could have been either a scorching satire or an outright tragedy, "W." is, if anything, overly conventional, especially stylistically. The picture possesses dramatic and entertainment value, but beyond serious filmgoers curious about how Stone deals with all this president's men and women, it's questionable how wide a public will pony up to immerse itself in a story that still lacks an ending.
To read the rest of the review, click HERE.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
VARIETY'S REVIEW FOR STONE'S 'W'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






1 comments:
I am so bored with Oliver Stone. When's the last time he even made a good film?
Post a Comment